Mortgage lenders slow to pass on rate cuts

by Money Doctor Thursday 15 May, 2008

Mortgage lenders are fairly quick to take money off us but clearly not so keen to return it in a hurry.

We say that because over a quarter of mortgage lenders have yet to announce their mortgage rate intentions; five weeks after the last interest rate cut by the Bank of England!

New data from comparison website Moneyfacts.co.uk shows 24 mortgage lenders have yet to state whether they will keep their standard variable rates (SVRs) on hold or reduce them.

Of those that have cut their rates, only 28% have passed on a reduction of less than the 0.25% cut in the base rate.

The Bank of England cut the official rate of interest by 0.25% to 5% on April 10; this was the third cut since December last year.

  • Who has been doing what?
Some mortgage lenders that have passed on the smallest cuts (largely building societies) already offer some of the highest SVRs on the market.

For example, Saffron Building Society has said it will keep its SVR at 7.15% while the Earl Shilton Building Society has cut its rate by just 0.05% to 7.35%.

Four others (Northern Rock, Barnsley BS, Nottingham BS and Scottish BS) have cut their rates by just 0.10%; the range now runs from 6.94% at the Scottish Building Society to 7.49% at Northern Rock.

Mortgage lenders have been scrapping cheap mortgages, failing to pass on reductions in the BoE base and tightening their lending criteria as they try to improve revenue during this credit crunch. The overall lack of movement has meant that many mortgage lenders' SVRs are now the same or less than rates on their product ranges.

ING Direct, Halifax, Lloyds TSB and Nationwide have stopped offering SVRs altogether to new customers. Moneyfacts' analyst Michelle Slade commented on the slow response by lenders:

"With falling house prices, and borrowers finding it harder and harder to get a new deal, the lenders' SVRs are becoming a more attractive option, but these lenders do not want to take on the more risky borrowers who do not have enough equity in their home to get a good deal."
  • Mortgages now in short supply
The data also showed that just 12% of mortgages still on the market are available with deposits of 5% or less, compared with 47% in August last year.

At the same time, the total number of mortgages available to you, including mainstream, adverse credit and buy-to-let mortgages has dropped sharply.

There are now just 3,847 mortgages available today, compared with 4,054 a month ago, 7,931 at the start of 2008 and 15,599 in July last year.

But don't worry, as despite the drop in numbers of available mortgages, there are still some competitive mortgage deals out there.

You should use an impartial adviser who can search all mortgage lenders, some you may never have heard of, to find the best deal for your situation.

(Please note that articles on Money Hospital do not constitute regulated financial advice. The articles are intended to provide general personal financial information. We urge you to consult an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA) before making any important decisions about your finances. All rates are correct at time of printing but are subject to change without notice.)

Related stories

Are you facing a mortgage shock?

What you need to know about remortgaging

Categories for this post: Mortgages

Related posts

Comments

Simon Beatty says:

Friday 16 May, 2008 / 18:05

They sound like the oil companies...

These companies are just blatantly profiteering at our expense and should be forced to pass on cost/rate cuts. Why should we all be forced to line the (Deep) pockets of the big bosses at these firms?

Mandy Robb says:

Friday 16 May, 2008 / 22:05

Pure greed. Those of us who are able, ie. with equity and not requiring 100% deals, should switch lenders asap. Serve them right. People power. Just do it.

Sick To Death says:

Saturday 17 May, 2008 / 08:05

Banks have been lending irresponsily across the globe during the good times. Now that there are bad times, which i would remind you is as a result of this lending to people who should not have had loans in the first place, they want to be baile out by the B of E using bonds of Tax Payers money AND continue to reep the benifits of lower B of E base rates while keeping their mortgage deals high. Adding to this set up fees have also gone through the roof. WHEN are banks going to be held accountable and to WHO will they be answerable to? At the moment they are in a win win situation with Joe Bloggs bailing them out when it should be the banks bending over backwards in gratitude that WE are bailing them out! ( i know my spelling sucks! )

marktristan says:

Monday 19 May, 2008 / 13:05

hey S2D, your spelling's not that bad Smile

Thing is, banks are businesses. You asked when are banks going to be held accountable and to whom will they be answerable? The answer is, every quarter, and to their shareholders.

Local building societies are slightly closer to a socially accountable model. Trouble is, they were going out of fashion for most of the last 20 years. Abbey, Halifax, Woolwich, they've all become banks.
There's still Nationwide and Britannia though, and plenty of others on a more local scale.

Add comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)
 
(optional)

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

says:

Monday 13 October, 2008 / 00:44


Recent comments