Are Government backed starter mortgages the answer?

by MoneyDoctor Tuesday 24 February, 2009

hospital_256 Many people have thrown given their tuppence worth as to what could help improve the state of the mortgage market.

And the Liberal Democrats are the latest to have their say…and its definitely worth looking at their plan.

The Liberal Democrats are calling for mortgage lenders to offer a “5 year, fixed, no fees, no frills” standard mortgage option where lenders compete to offer you the cheapest rate.

They believe that the introduction of basic mortgages secured by the Government would protect borrowers from the collapse in lending by banks and building societies.

  • Safestart mortgage

Safestart mortgages would be fixed for 5 years at a suggested interest rate of around 4.5% and would be available to those of you with a deposit of 15%, and it would come without fees. It would initially be offered to you at 85% LTV and if you kept up repayments the LTV would fall to 75% over the five-year term.

The Liberal Democrats argue that there is no place in the current market for mortgages of 100% LTV or more, given the threat of negative equity that many of us face over the next few years.

Read: Are 100% mortgages making a return?

Get unbiased, FSA-authorised advice on choosing a mortgage

Sarah Teather, Liberal Democrat Housing spokeswoman, and Vince Cable, Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, introduced the proposal at the launch of a plan to boost social housing.  Vince Cable said:

“It is critical, not only for those who may lose their homes but also for the wider economy, that we have a comprehensive plan to ensure that repossession is only ever a last resort”.

“In the future, people must have access to low risk, simple mortgages which ensure that those who have sensible deposits are protected from negative equity.”

  • Government guarantee?

The Lib Dems believe that safestart mortgages could be backed by a Government guarantee which would protect mortgage lenders from the risk that you may default on the loans.

However, the Lib Dems say the guarantees would more likely come from insurers. Insurers would guarantee against the depth of house price falls, rather than the asset quality of each mortgage.

Aaron Strutt, of Chase de Vere Mortgage Management, said:

"It is welcome that politicians are looking into ways to open up the mortgage market to more borrowers. The problem facing homeowners is that lenders are reducing the loan-to-value ratios of their deals, excluding more homeowners from the housing market. However there is nothing like this in the market at the moment."

  • Will it break the deadlock?

The Lib Dems say their plan is designed to break the current deadlock in the mortgage market, caused by the collapse in wholesale money markets which traditionally supported new mortgage lending.

Mortgage lending fell to a record low in January, further highlighting the dire state of the housing market and thus fuelling the need for a viable solution. 

Risk wary mortgage lenders are also reserving the most competitive mortgage deals for those of you with a 40% deposit. Those of you with less than a 25% deposit now face much higher interest rates.

Lord Oakeshott, Treasury Spokesman for the Liberal Democrats, said:

“We are trying to design a sensible, safe mortgage which will be the default option that every lender should offer.

“If we are going to be giving government guarantees it should be for mortgages that are safe and solid, rather than writing a blank cheque for all mortgage products.”

So, is the Safestart mortgage the practical solution that is needed to help improve the mortgage market?

If so, do you think the Government will put it into action?

let us know your thoughts in the comments below.

- Get unbiased mortgage advice

- Claim back your mortgage exit fees

Bookmark and Share

Categories for this post:

Sponsored Links

Comments

Dir Man says:

Wednesday 25 February, 2009 / 17:11

The safestart mortgage sounds ideal!

Halal Mortgage says:

Thursday 26 February, 2009 / 09:34

I don't believe there is a place in the market for 100% mortgages.

Chris McCabe says:

Thursday 26 February, 2009 / 10:22

Council housing is needed for people on the lowest wages, & those who will never be able to afford to buy, through no fault of their own - many people cannot commit all their income to a house, & why should they?

Bruce Aaron Jackson says:

Thursday 26 February, 2009 / 13:10

The trouble with this Government is they're all talk.
I would like to see more action on this subject and will be surprised if they actually do consider implementing this idea.

Richard says:

Thursday 26 February, 2009 / 14:03


It sounds obvious, but if people can't afford a house, perhaps they shouldn't buy a house?  It's not a god-given right to be able to buy a house. If you can't afford one, rent.
The governement should do nothing. The market will sort itself out when prices fall well below the ridiclously inflated levels we have seen in recent years.
When the average wage can afford the mortgage on the average house, we will be getting close the right place.

paul says:

Friday 27 February, 2009 / 17:28

People want low prices and bigger better home.....well sorry you can't have both.... or can you...People need to be vetted better.  from time to time people will have financial problems...not becouse they want these problem but they just find them in the course of life.
The banks thing they can do as they please.  ' Customer is always right comes to mind'
The banks need to look at how they can 'HELP' the customer....if I a customer offers to pay something for a house they are living in accept it... ita home..... in the longterm the home-owner will end up paying for the property anyway....so dont kick them out for a short term benifit......lets look at the long term prospects (if we have any)......lets all work together on this.

Rob says:

Monday 02 March, 2009 / 11:24

It seems to me that some of the housing problems being experienced to day are a knock on affect of when the tories introduced the right to buy (Council owned properties).

This created a larger population of home owners resulting in higher demand for mortgages and properties thus driving up house prices and now we are seeing the south sea bubble syndrome. Having said this the american sub prime mortgage market hasn,t done us any favours and the banks that got caught up in this should be treated like any other business that is broke and be allowed to go down the pan instead of being proped up by the tax payer, many of whom aren't even home owners themselves. If only it were that simple.

We do need a system to protect both the lender and the borrower so maybe the safestart mortgage is the answer.

billy says:

Monday 02 March, 2009 / 11:32

Suppose these new home buyers are renters im not quite how sure they are going to find a 15% deposit.
On a 100k home thats 15k deposit admittedly the repayments of 85k @ 4.5% are only 73 pounds a week Interest only.

So the 100% mortgage helps people in the initial phase but with falling prices that will leave a bank with negative equity.

So its catch 22.

The only cold comfort is that with falling prices the initial deposit is getting smaller all the time. And I believe rents are also falling at present indeed my tenant has asked for a 10% reduction or they will leave.
This I find a bit insulting as the property in question has been let to them 6% below market values for the past 3 years.
It appears that tenants see landlords as another form of charity.

So with prices falling for rents and houses it wont be long before all tenants can get out there and buy their own houses. Thus causing another boom.

Steve says:

Monday 02 March, 2009 / 15:30

Lib Dems seem to have got the problem wrong again. There isnt a problem with demand for mortgages rather that banks can get the money to lend out without improving their balance sheets first.

First time buyers dont need special mortgages, they need the prices to fall to a realistic level so they can get on the ladder at 85%LTV etc.

Its funny how only now politicians moan about 100% LTV and yet Vince Cable said nothing on the BBC back in October when I was on the politics show stating that people shouldn't be allowed to borrow so much money.


Add comment




biquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading






Sponsored Links

Recent comments