Getting a mortgage; should you use a broker or a lender?

by Admin Tuesday 27 May, 2008

These days, finding a good mortgage might feel a bit like trying to track down the Loch Ness monster; rumours abound but can you actually find it?

As you know, there are many ways to get a mortgage. You can get it by post, phone, through the internet, by interactive TV; the list is endless.

But the reality comes down to this; to find a good mortgage, should you use a mortgage lender or should you use an impartial adviser?

That's a good question. So, here are some pros and cons to using both.

Going direct

A lot of you like to do your own homework, pick the mortgage you want and then go straight to a mortgage lender to get it.

Well, you could be paying more to take out a mortgage through a broker as increasing numbers of mortgage lenders do offer better rates to those of you going direct to their branches.

According to analyst Moneyfacts, of the top 20 2 year fixed-rate mortgages, (based on a loan of £150,000), the 13 best deals are only available directly from the lender. Three of the top 20 deals are available through an adviser.

Looking at the Moneyfacts table, the best 2 year fixed rate mortgage comes from Welsh building society Principality, at 5.99% with no fee. You can get it if you have a deposit of 25% or more.

For those with a 10% deposit, the Loughborough building society offers you a 5.75% rate for 2 years but you do have to pay a £649 fee to pay.

Darren Cook of Moneyfacts said:

'With continuing uncertainty in the mortgage market and the total number of products continuing to decline, many more people will be considering approaching a broker to find them the best mortgage deal. However, many brokers are finding that their choice of products to recommend to clients has been increasingly restricted as more lenders move to offer their most competitive products just for direct-only business.'

Last week First Direct welcomed back new mortgage customers after a brief stint away from the market. It is offering a cheaper 2 year fixed rate mortgage than the Principality at 5.76% for those of you with a deposit of 20%; however, the bank has started charging two fees to this mortgage which comes to around £2,000!

Exclusive deals

Mortgage lenders are also giving you exclusive deals if you take out another product with them; here are a few examples:

  • Halifax's range of first-time buyer mortgages are available with a deposit of as little as 3%. Rates start at 6.39% but if you want a LTV greater than 90%, you will need to open or already hold a salary funded Halifax/Bank of Scotland current account.
  • HSBC offers you enhanced rates if you have either its Plus or Premier current accounts. To qualify for a Premier account, you need to have a mortgage of at least £250,000 and a salary of over £70,000 or stock market investments with HSBC. HSBC's normal rate for its fixed-rate mortgages is 5.98%. As a Plus customer, you would get the loan at 5.88% and Premier customers at 5.78%.

Using an adviser

Others of you prefer to use an impartial adviser or broker; this is because most of them can search all mortgage lenders, (including some you may never have heard of) to find the best deal for your situation.

David Hollingworth of fee-free mortgage broker London & Country says the lenders' practice of offering exclusive deals is 'muddying the waters' of the increasingly complicated mortgage market:

'It is a backward step when banks are cross-selling products to customers with their mortgage and that customer is buying without getting advice. In this uncertain environment advice is more important than ever.'

 

Melanie Bien of brokers SPF agrees:

'You will only be advised on the products that the lender has on offer by someone who is not a qualified financial adviser,' she says, adding that you will be very lucky if your lender can offer you products that are the most suitable for your needs.

 

Last week the Financial Services Authority (FSA) said when brokers recognised that there were more competitive products available direct from mortgage lenders they should tell you about them. But, he added, they could still charge you for such advice.

Mortgage adviser Mform has warned that if you are regarded as a high risk customer, then you might only be offered standard variable rate mortgages by your existing mortgage lender under new 'customer profiling' rules when your current mortgage runs out.

So, as you can see, there are both pros and cons to going direct to a mortgage lender or by using an impartial adviser.

But ultimately the decision is yours; happy mortgage hunting!

Related stories

No account, no mortgage, says Halifax

Get a new mortgage and go to Barbados

Bookmark and Share

Categories for this post: Mortgages

Sponsored Links

Comments

ryan says:

Friday 30 May, 2008 / 10:05

i have always used a mortgage brokers to get all my mortgages beause they do in fact save alot of money! even if i could go to the local bank an the offer an exclusive deal for a customer to go direct then the broker can search the whole market and still get beatter deals from another company!

Saffy says:

Friday 30 May, 2008 / 18:05

Going direct has it's concerns - even though an existing customer with a clear payment record, advisor was out for her own commision only, poor service received from Abbey with a dreadful, incompetent advisor

Dionne says:

Tuesday 03 June, 2008 / 00:06

well we are trying to get a mortgage (first time buyers) at the moment and we used a broker and never again they were a waste of space talking to a brick wall and if u wanna know who it was, it was first mortgage every lender my a!"e it took them 2 months to get ABBEY (never again s%$t company) to still come back asking for more or re do all we had put in before, truthfully they just didn't want to give us the mortgage (tell tale signs of credit crunch crisis), both companies have poor customer services and just talk alot of bull, i would never recommend going to a broker i found it easier and more efficient to research all the lenders myself i got more sense from my computer than i did the brokers, we ended up just going into the lender who advertised the best rate
and don't get me started on the fact that first mortgage had actually set us up for a mortgage protection insurance and the company started taking money out before we even got the mortgage just total incompetance!!!!!!!!!!!

Lexzy says:

Tuesday 03 June, 2008 / 09:06

I employed the services of a broker back in 2006 for my mortgage and lost out on two different properties simply because my broker could not finalise a deal even with my good salary. After  wasting 3 months with the broker I then walked in to my bank and was given a good rate (4.99%)and completed within 3 weeks, my 2 years fixed rate has now ended and I've being offered a new rate of 5.63% this is because I have a plus account with them which can be cancelled after 12 months. It is advisable to compare what a broker can source for you with what your bank can offer as banks are willing to give a good deal if you've being banking with them for over 6 months and your income goes into the account regularly.

SimplyHalalMortgages says:

Thursday 06 November, 2008 / 09:12

Even if you do use a broker, have a look round yourself, there maybe deals you can get yourself that the broker can't. It pays dividends and could potentially save you thousands in the long run all for a few minutes work.

Brian Diaper says:

Thursday 06 November, 2008 / 09:24

Mortgage brokers, waste of time. All they are interested in is maximising their commission. I had one looking for me in May/June, eventually sorted it out myself and saved 50-60 quid a month on the ones the brokers were pushing. Went with an offset from Woolwich.

Add comment




biquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading






Sponsored Links

Recent comments