The staff here at the Money Hospital have been discussing the merits of the Budget and whether or not is has made life easier or harder for some of us.
Though a few of you are better off from the Budget, many of you feel your pocket is being pinched by the present Government.
Was the Budget fair some of you have asked? Why do we keep paying some of the highest taxes in the world was another question?
The biggest question of all was how much of the money going back to Government is being frittered away supporting a system that seems to ignore the hard working professional or family?
Matron (being the most intelligent of all of us!) noticed that the common theme in the comments we've received, is that many of you think Britain has become a soft touch and that we are allowing people to get away with doing next to nothing, while the hard working amongst us support their lifestyles.
A prime example of that could be unemployed father-of-17 Mick Philpott; the man who sparked outrage by suggesting that Britain was "going down the pan" because Derby City Council was unable to provide him with a bigger house.
Currently, he lives with two women and nine of his children in a council house. Mr. Philpott shares the house with his girlfriend, Lisa Willis (with whom he has 3 children) and also his wife Mairead, who is the mother of their 5 children. Mr. Philpott is also father to 6 other children who are from previous relationships.
The family currently lives on £508 per week benefits, (more than the weekly salary of most says Matron) which are awarded to the two women, along with income from Mrs Philpott's part-time job as a domestic assistant.
Mr. Philpott said, "People who think I am a scrounger, do they pay £68-a-week rent and £51-a-week on council tax? We are paying that, not the council or the social."
Matron said she would be delighted to be paying £51-a-week council tax for a four-bedroom house and also said perhaps he should consider where the £508 a week benefits come from?
MP Ann Widdecombe is to spend a week living with Mr. Philpott as part of a TV programme for ITV1. It is believed that Mrs Widdecombe was initially shocked when the producers offered her a chance to live with Mr. Philpott but, after thinking it over, was keen to go ahead. A spokesman for ITV Productions said: "Ann Widdecombe has a deserved reputation for tackling key social issues head-on and this new series will see her on the front line again."
Channel Four and Channel 5 are both reportedly interested in contacting him, including Closer magazine who paid him £2,000 for his "story". Following the £2,000 payment by Closer magazine the Derby City Council decided that housing benefit paid to his girlfriend and his wife should be reviewed. (Quite right too says Matron!)
Matron says she feels this could be symptomatic of Britain today; but what do you think?
Are we paying too much to support the likes of Mr. Philpott or do we have an obligation to provide benefits to those who are unable to work (for whatever reason)?
Whilst there is no denying that the benefit system should support those people and families genuinely in need, are we being held to ransom by such individuals who know their rights and play the system?
Matron is looking forward to hearing your thoughts...