Stamp duty holiday for homebuyers

by MoneyDoctor Tuesday 02 September, 2008

hospital_256 Gordon Brown has announced plans to revive the stagnant housing market…

…and clearly try and and save his own flagging leadership!

Gordon Brown has announced that properties costing less than £175,000 will be exempt from stamp duty for the next year!

This £600 million measure will take more buyers at the bottom end of the housing market (likely to be first-time buyers) out of the stamp duty bracket altogether, saving them up to £1,750.

The average UK property now costs £164,000 and at present those of you wishing to  buy properties that cost between £125,000 and £250,000 have to pay 1% of the price to the Government in tax.

Howvere before we al get to excited by the announcement, the stamp duty holiday does not extnd to those of you with properties worth more than £250,000; you will have to keep paying the 3% in stamp duty.

Homes above £500,000 attract 4% in stamp duty. 

David Kuo, Head of Personal Finance at money website Fool.co.uk, says

The temporary raising of the stamp duty threshold from £125,000 to £175,000 will save homebuyers up to £1,750 when they purchase a property.

As a result of today’s concession by the Treasury, almost half of all housing transactions will now be exempt from stamp duty. However, stamp duty is just one of many costs that house buyers need to consider when purchasing a home.

Affordability is crucial, and with house prices still overvalued Fool.co.uk urges prospective buyers to tread carefully. Any benefits from a one-off tax boost could be wiped out if house prices fall as little as 1%.

Additionally, a stamp duty holiday will be forgotten when you are mid-way into a 25-year mortgage term. The saving of £1,750 in stamp duty, whilst welcome, represents less than 0.5% of the total repayments on a £175,000 mortgage over 25 years.  

In a falling property market, it is more important to be able to regularly overpay your mortgage to sidestep the problem of negative equity rather than be swayed by temporary tax giveaways.

The borrowers survival guide

Stamp Duty  - The Facts

Stamp duty is a tax charged by the government when you buy property or shares. There are different kinds of stamp duty, which apply to different purchases.

  • Stamp duty on homes and land

Stamp duty land tax (SDLT) is levied by the government on the purchase of houses, flats and other land and buildings. The tax, which is often referred to simply as stamp duty, has existed in various forms since the 1690s.

  • How much you will pay

Stamp duty is currently graded into four bands and represents a percentage of a property's purchase price.

On properties costing up to £175,000 there is currently no duty to pay. After that there are three stamp duty tiers:

£175,001 to £250,000 = 1%

£250,001 to £500,000 = 3%

£500,001 and above = 4%

The 0% threshold has been increased by the government on a temporary basis, running for 12 months until September 3 2009. At that point, it may be adjusted back down to previous level of £125,000.

Your stamp duty bill is calculated on what has been dubbed a "slab structure" rather than being charged on a sliding scale. This means that if your property costs between £250,001 and £500,000 you pay 3% of the entire value, not just 3% on the portion that goes over the £250,000 threshold. This is unlike income tax where you pay a different tax rate on different portions of your earnings.

A word of warning is that this can make for huge jumps in the tax levied against the price of your house. For example, if you pay £250,000 for your home your stamp duty bill will be £2,500. However, if you pay £250,001 you jump to the 3% band and your tax bill trebles to £7,500.03!

  • Minimising your bill

Rather than buying somewhere for a price just over one of the thresholds and facing a large bill, it might seem like a good idea to agree a lower purchase price and a separate price for items such as the carpets and curtains.

However, since 2003 purchasers have been expected to fill in a Land Transaction Return form.

This is a complicated 6 page document of 70 questions, outlining in detail the nature of the transaction (click here for a sample copy) and is designed to weed out instances where a property price has been kept artificially low.

  • Stamp duty-free properties

From September 3 there will be no stamp duty to pay on properties costing up to £175,000. This is a temporary threshold in place of the previous £125,000 threshold and has been implemented by the government in an attempt to get the property market moving and help first-time buyers.

As of October 1 2007, zero-carbon homes have also been subject to different rules. All qualifying properties changing hands for up to £500,000 are exempt from the tax, while those valued at more than £500,000 have £15,000 knocked off their stamp duty bill.

For the purpose of stamp duty relief, a zero-carbon home means a home that is energy efficient in terms of heat loss, C02 emission rate and net C02 emissions. However, the regulations only have effect until September 30 2012, and buyers of a second-hand zero-carbon home will not qualify for the tax relief.

In 2005, the government introduced something called disadvantaged areas relief in the hope of stimulating residential sales and regenerating certain locations. A property in one of these designated areas that costs less than £150,000 was free from stamp duty. Now, of course, properties would be free from stamp duty up to the new £175,000 temporary threshold.

  • Paying the tax

SDLT is a self-assessed tax, so it is the responsibility of the individual buyer to ensure that they have accurately calculated and paid their liability. However, in reality most of this will be carried out as part of the duties of the buyer's solicitor. He or she will generally complete the Land Transaction Return form, supplied by HMRC, and pass this on to the buyer to be read and signed.

The tax must be paid within 30 days of the effective date of the transaction, which in most circumstances is the date of completion on the property. Once the Land Registry has received a certificate from HMRC that the duty has been paid, it will register the new ownership of the property.

So, are you pleased by the news that some stamp duty will be suspended, or will it not make any difference?

Should Gordon Brown be doing anything else to improve the mortgage and property markets?

Categories for this post: Money Saving | Mortgages

Related sites

Related posts

Comments

Glynn says:

Thursday 04 September, 2008 / 17:10

I strongly believe that Stamp Duty should be modified so that it operates on a scale as income tax does.
It is totally unfair it should now be, say on a 500K purchase, 0% on the first 175K - 1% on the amount from 175K up to 250K and 3% from 250K up to the next level. It should be proportional as income tax is. Why should the above scenario attract any tax on the first 175 K ?.

Can't wait to see this government go.

Tina says:

Thursday 04 September, 2008 / 19:35

I BELIEVE THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD HAVE FROZEN ALL STAMP DUTY FOR THE NEXT YEAR. THEN ANY PROPERTY OVER 500K NEXT YEAR COULD HAVE A STAMP DUTY OF 1% & 750K 2% ETC. THE GOVERNMENT MAKES EASY MONEY ON THIS STAMP DUTY AND IT IS ABOUT TIME US HOUSE BUYERS AND SELLERS HAD SOME LUCK AND POUNDS IN OUR POCKETS.

Maria says:

Thursday 04 September, 2008 / 20:30

I think that they should scrap all stamp duty until the economy recovers a little bit. I think it is money for nothing quite frankly. It is expensive to move home and try improve ones life without having to pay stamp duty each and every time one moves.

Kate Brooks says:

Thursday 04 September, 2008 / 21:02

Why couldn't the Government scrap stamp duty on all homes for a period of time, until the housing market is boyant again. I have been trying to sell my home for almost a year now with little success. The housing market is moving at the lower end, it is the properties 400k and above where the market is static and scrapping the 4% stamp duty at this end of the market could make a really big difference. It's not the best time to be selling but circumstances dictate sometimes.

Adrian Brown says:

Friday 05 September, 2008 / 00:01

When most 3 bedroom houses are costing in excess of 175,000, People like me with 3 children still have the 1800 pound bill we can ill afford on a small house costing 180,000. Familys have been let down again, without us moving up the ladder there is no first time propertys to buy! This goverment really have no clue. Gordon needs to get advice about bugeting from people in the real world, Us!

shaukat ali says:

Friday 05 September, 2008 / 00:06

why couldn;t it be scrap we pay tax on everything eles.

Larry says:

Friday 05 September, 2008 / 09:44

This news has little to no impact on those who live in London as the average family HOUSE price is £250k anyway. Especially for those in North East London (Walthamstow, Hackney, Chingford, Leyton, Leytonstone, Stratford etc) there is still no relief for the house prices. I believe that there should be some form of consideration for these families (many of whom have lived in these areas all their lives and are now being forced out)

jeremy price says:

Friday 05 September, 2008 / 10:45

Once again this government penalise those living in the south east of the country where it is rare to find any property under £175k.

If Brown was serious about making a difference rather than as usual spin to make himself sound like a hero then he would scrap it completely just as the tories did when we were in this position. But of course he cant as he totally overspent when times were good, created so many new government jobs and just bleeds the coffers dry with advisor's and spin doctors that he now has no money at all to help the peopel of this country who didnt elect him in the first place. The cupboard is bare, so much for "Fiscal Prudence".

Paul says:

Friday 05 September, 2008 / 23:05

The level of £175000 is pathetic. Many towns already have certain 'wards' where the threshold is increased to £150000, so in these areas its only a 25k increase!Why introduce a new threshold?? They should have made it up to £250000. The goverment state that this move will cost £600million from their coffers, in reality its the taxpayers money and this figure was based on 2007 transactions. So if the current level of transactions have reduced by 75%, they are only committing 25% of the suggested figure. Talk about Labour SPIN!

Andye says:

Saturday 06 September, 2008 / 09:37

Too Little too late....
I am a developer who is now reaping the rewards of others misery,but if i dont ...someone else will.
I bought a 2 bed luxury apt last week,built in 2005 and they paid 135K now i have bought it for 85k as a repo and another 2 bed terrace for 65k (worth 120k),I am buying as much and as quick as i can because the current climate will only last until the conservatives get in and scrap Hips.
Stamp duty concession is not enough, but if he temporary scrapped hips as well, that would be much better but still not enough as it is about people confidence.
People confidence will buy houses which will keep builders and trade in work,and builders buying pints in the pubs will keep the barmaid in a job, which means she will need childcare ect.
Gordon needs to open up a national bank that specialises in first time buyer 100% mortgages (still charging the normal fees with taxpayers money),Reason being this will encourage the market to move and taxpayers will benefit from the profits,Problem is with this country is the extortionate profits that banks such as Santander (abbey,a&l) make are not going back into the country because santander is spanish owned.

P.s His move with stamp duty is crap!!!He has now put more pressure on the other bands,Detached houses are sinking faster 200-220k where we are.
He should have scrapped all stamp duty!! Forever!! after all it is goverment Theft just like inheritence tax!!
If he needs more more money he can cut local spending on street cleaning ect and get the unemployed to help the community.

ron crawford says:

Tuesday 09 September, 2008 / 06:26

Stamp duty is an evil imposition. A council house costs around £130,000. The interest on that alone is nearly £8,000 and for those who do pay the rent, it leaves an annual public subsidy of around £5,000 without taking repayment of capital into account.
Those who take that burden off the State by buying their own home, should be rewarded, not penalised by the imposition of this evil tax.
It is time it was abolished and mortgage interest tax relief introduced but it is unlikely our Marxist masters will do that.

caroline says:

Wednesday 10 September, 2008 / 09:56

I THINK THIS BAD STATE WE ARE IN MITE BE GOOD FOR EVERYONE!!! ITS TIME THAT HOUSE PRICES CORRECTED THEMSELVES!!!!! AS ALL HOUSES ARE FAR TOO OVER VALUED!!!!!! THEY SHOULD GO BACK DOWN TO THEIR REAL VALUES!!!! IM A FIRST TIME BUYER TRYING TO GET ON THE LADDER AND HOPEFULLY THIS TIME NEXT YEAR IM HOPING PRICES CORRECT THEMSELVES AND I CAN AFFORD A MORTGAGE!!! THE GOVERNMENT ARE GREEDY AND HAVE CREATED THIS MESS!!!!! NOW THEY NEED TO SORT IT!!!!!!

Bob Fleming says:

Wednesday 10 September, 2008 / 11:20

STOP SHOUTING CAROLINE!!!!

beingsalt says:

Wednesday 10 September, 2008 / 11:20

is your exclamation key stuck?

Charles says:

Wednesday 10 September, 2008 / 11:22

CAROLINE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I THINK YOU NEED TO SORT OUT YOUR SHOUTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHY WRITE ALL IN CAPS?????????????????????????????????????

Why can you not just write like a normal person? A gentle balance of upper- and lower-case characters, mixed with some nice punctuation, but only one character to end a sentence. And most of a time that should be a period, not 17 exclamation marks.

I'm thinking you might also appreciate the wildly unused Interrobang:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang

Caroline says:

Wednesday 10 September, 2008 / 14:24

SMARTY PANTS BOB FLEMING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bob Fleming says:

Wednesday 10 September, 2008 / 14:24

I was just saying there is no need to shout -we can all hear you! ;)

jackie says:

Wednesday 10 September, 2008 / 17:50

Never mind scrapping stamp duty under £175,000 this ridiculous government need to help 1st time buyers. My property has been wanted by two young couples and both have not been able to get a mortgage due to this i am probably going to lose the house that i have offered on. It,s time for this bloody Labour government to start helping 1st time buyers for new and resale properties. Once they start getting more help with mortgages the housing market might get going again

Stixe says:

Wednesday 10 September, 2008 / 19:02

My house is - well was - worth more than £175,000 and I have a not got a huge mortgage so I am lucky. I am also not looking to move so the 12 month suspension of stamp duty won't affect me. I agree that the market will not move until first time buyers are able to again afford to get on the ladder. However, I believe that the only sustainable way that for things to move on is for this country to go back to a save and spend ethos rather than a credit and repay. So they have to save the money to get the deposit rather than have 100% mortgage because if something should go wrong with their finances and 1) they are in a hole which means that they can't pay their mortgage and 2) if the market drops then they get into negative equity which again will cause the banks to lose money. I started on the ladder with shared equity in 1994 when it was first introduced and was able to move on swiftly to whole ownership - that is where first time buyers can be helped NOT 100% of house price, but 100% of share...

Tanya says:

Friday 12 September, 2008 / 22:01

I have only just started reading about stamp duty holiday so may have missed this, can anyone tell me if this applies to Scotland as well? Also, I have applied for a mortgage to start on my second home on the 19/9/08 therefore should the stamp duty holiday include me if this commenced from the 3/9/08?

jon says:

Friday 17 October, 2008 / 07:46

Help me out here, why is it that stamp duty is not an allowance for all home buyers? Seems very unfair to me that middle man has no choice for a family home but to pay the tax.

Add comment

(required)

(required, will not be published)
 
(optional)

[b][/b] - [i][/i] - [u][/u]- [quote][/quote]



Live preview

says:

Friday 21 November, 2008 / 01:13


Related sites

Recent comments